Class+Spreadsheet

~Not require the printing of the final product -Developing the ideal classroom scenario without ever going back to reflect and make improvements to it (I think this was for both 510&530) || +Additional familiarity with various applications ~Provided quality feedback in a timely manner -The content of the activities were often irrelevent || +Doing the learning matrix really helped me develop a deeper understanding ~Broken up and assigned some of the readings to groups/individuals to report on -The Professional Associations and Competencies Scavenger Hunt and Matrix activity || +I really found it valuable to analyze my own work and apply the techniques as I learned about them ~Provide feedback that is more specific all the time as sometimes it seemed generic -Nothing, I found everything valuable || +I learned many important things about program evaluation ~There is nothing I would have done differently -Nothing, I found everything valuable || +Gaining additional information/perspectives about technology planning ~If possible reduce technical difficulties -It was all valuable || +I enjoyed being challenged to think more deeply and to learn about others perspectives regarding technology issues ~As the instructor participate as an expert in the discussions or incorporate access to an expert(s) on-line -At the time the reflections seemed repetative but in retrospect they were valuable || +Developing the technology integrated lesson plan was most important for me ~More on the integrated lesson planning -The portfolio assignment || +I learned many important things about distance education that are valuable ~Provided clear deadlines and provided advance notice of mid-week deadlines -Spending time trying to locate information on the moodle || +Learning more about networking ~I would not have done anything differently -Printing more than needed copies || -This course was well done. I can think of nothing to change. -The least valuable piece of this class was developing the ideal tech scenario without ever using/revisiting it. || -The most valuable parts of this class were the tutorial podcasts. -If I were teaching it, I might either open up the advanced projects to use Web 2.0 applications- maybe of the user’s choice w/instructor okay or have the advanced project be a lesson plan incorporating the tool of the basic project. -Least valuable…I hate concept mapping, so that was the least valuable piece for me. || -The How People Learn matrix was fabulous. -This course had an abundance of great information. I think it could have been beneficial to develop an online forum for discussion/ knowledge building purposes. -Least valuable: Really nothing, but I still hate concept mapping. Could have done without that piece and not felt any the poorer, although I see the purpose…. || -Learning the tricks of the trade- rule of thirds, interpretation /uses of colors, flow, etc. Much of this felt intuitive, but it was good to actually learn why/how it fits together with learning. -I thought the format of the class was good, but we might have benefited from critiquing work other than our own- e.g., professionally produced work. -Nothing comes to mind as "less valuable, " but I think it would have been most valuable to try Thai Carrot Salad on the last day of class. Just sayin’… || -This class was great! I think the most valuable aspect of this class was the big picture of evaluation that it created- like its own little ecosystem, each piece was interconnected and important to the whole. -Things to change? I think that the course should be a requirement for administrative leadership degrees. That doesn't really change the course; it only recommends broadening the audience. -Least valuable part was probably the resume work. ||  ||   ||   || This was a great model for an online class. I enjoyed recognizing the strategies and seeing all of the pieces come together. -I think the course was well-structured and covered a broad spectrum of topics pertinent to distance learning. If something on Learning Management Systems (Moodle?) could be worked into the class, that would be nice. Not sure there is time for anything else, though. - If I had to choose, I would say the synchronous sessions were the least valuable. ||  || programs
 * Class || ETT 510 || ETT 530 || ETT 501 || ETT 511 || ETR 531 || ETT 570 || ETT 553 || ETT 571 || ETT 535 || ETT 573 ||
 * Peg Keiner || * Learning to design for the needs of a learning was very beneficial.
 * Give resources as references. Make people compare and contrast plans. Creating this with no model was very challenging.
 * Least valuable- either make copies for each person or have them available on line. || * Important part: Great to have time to explore all the tools.
 * Midway through the course, no feedback was given for the rest of the assignments. For all the work required, feedback would have been appreciated. Let us choose the topic. Assignment topics were not relevant or useful.
 * Least valuable item- None of the projects were of quality or relevant. || * History of technology was interesting to research as was the learning matrix.
 * Change the about of information needed in the history portion and have students compare instructional technology usage now to then.
 * Associations matrix was least valuable. || * Image message design principals were practiced using relevant material.
 * I would change the way synchronous time is spent. students could watch the presentations online.
 * I really enjoyed the class and use what I learned daily. || * Program Evaluation techniques.
 * What I would have done differently was nothing -Nothing. This class used relevant materials and techniques. Time was valuable and planned well.
 * Everything in this course was valuable. This course was planned out well with lots of information that I continue to transfer into my current job. || * I really enjoyed making the budget, AUP, and creation of relevant materials.
 * More resources to look and and discussion about what kinds of things should be in an AUP and why. We need to have more discussions about the reasoning behind our decisions.
 * Signing up for roles. We had already established jobs in our group. Just seemed unnecessary. || * Forum discussion was very engaging and interesting.
 * I enjoyed the books, but include some current articles that are school based ethics issues.
 * I really enjoyed learning about the standards and court cases. Everything was valuable. || * Creating the PD assignment was extremely relevant and beneficial.
 * Maybe include more resources, examples that are problem based where we suggest the best design/fit for the group.
 * Everything was valuable. || * This was my favorite class because we were given so many valuable resources. the distance ed doc is something I still use!
 * Didn't get feedback on documents when we asked for it. Other groups did.
 * I really enjoyed this class, just wish we received more feedback on the weekly assignments. || * This is the class I really needed/wanted to know more about.
 * Make sure the assignment requirements match the resources provided. Provide more than one resource for the major project.
 * Feedback was minimal and I never felt like we on the right .path. ||
 * Erin Olson || * Important: Learning about all the components of instructional design
 * Do Differently: Nothing, it was nice being able to make changes to each step
 * Least Valuable: Would have been nice to have a copy of the final product for other groups as examples and references || * Important: Getting a chance to play with some tools I had never used before
 * Do Differently: Lots of assignments, not much time to produce a quality piece of work on core assignments, no feedback made completing advanced assignments difficult
 * Least Valuable: The reflections || * Important: Professional association matrix
 * Do Differently: Continue with exemplary participant work examples
 * Least Valuable: Learning theories, as it was a review from undergrad courses || * Important: Being able to take something I use every year in my classroom and sprucing it up
 * Do Differently: Nothing
 * Least Valuable: Having multiple weeks to make almost the same corrections, which weren't necessarily necessary || * Important: Real world application of the program evaluation
 * Do Differently: Nothing
 * Least Valuable: Nothing || * Important: Creating the hardware and software plans and budgets and other documents
 * Do Differently: Nothing
 * Least Valuable: Group roles, because our group already took care of everything. (Easy to do with only 2 people!) || * Important: Reading and responding to different viewpoints from my colleagues
 * Do Differently: More interaction with students/have synchronous sessions
 * Least Valuable: Nothing || * Important: Staff development assignment
 * Do Differently: More tech integrated lessons and staff development
 * Least Valuable: Theory, as it was covered in a previous class || * Important: Final design document product
 * Do Differently: Due dates for the same assignment were listed as 3 different dates, which was confusing.
 * Least Valuable: The jigsaw and some of the connect sessions || * Important: All of it, creating the final product was difficult without seeing an example, but necessary
 * Do Differently: Give an example of a full network plan, or have a synchronous session about the final product, as well as give more feedback
 * Least Valuable: Printing off so many coping of the diagrams for the face-to-face session ||
 * Hope Paskus || * Important: The project for this class gave a good feeling as to what the program, as a whole, was getting us ready for as a Tech. Specialist
 * Do Differently: I liked the process and the working for mastery aspect so I would't change anything.
 * Least Valuable: Only seeing our work during the process. Find a way to share work with other students along the way so students can troubleshoot with each other. || * Important: Great to see so many different pieces of software and getting a chance to use them.
 * Do Differently: Too many assignments, too fast. Really not reasonable to learn a piece of software in a week and use it well. Lack of feedback did become an issue.
 * Least Valuable: Having to complete an advance assignment along with a intro assignment. || * Important: I liked completing the association matrix.
 * Do Differently: Although it is important to cover learning theories I would focus more on technology use and their usefulness in those learning theories.
 * Least Valuable: It was all useful but since I am a teacher there was a repeat of information. || * Important: I used something that I use every year in my classroom and I was able to improve it and then use it.
 * Do Differently: Nothing
 * Least Valuable: Nothing, I found it a very useful class. || * Important:Program Evaluation, real world application in this assignment.
 * Do Differently:This class seemed well planned out and time was used well. At this point most people had fallen into predicatable groups and I could see a need to mix things up so people get to hear different points of view.
 * Least Valuable: I don't recall anything. || * Important: Creating budgets, AUPs and other administration documents.
 * Do Differently: The AUP could use a little more discussion as to the reasoning behind what should be included in it.
 * Least Valuable: I can't recall some of the online group activities so they could be improved. || * Important: The exposure to the ethical situations and the time to think about how it can influence our work.
 * Do Differently: I was not able to keep up with all of the reading. Important to find some situations that related to education. Instructor should be part of the discussions.
 * Least Valuable: I don't recall anything. || * Important: The staff development assignment.
 * Do Differently: I would expand that assignment and have students troubleshoot situations and the most useful tech tools for those situations.
 * Least Valuable: We covered theory in another class so it wasn't needed here. || * Important: Important to see another type of proposal and to see another side to tech in education. Delivery of classes through technology. Lots of discussion.
 * Do Differently: Keep due dates consistant with other classes. Creating something or learning about delivery options for distance education.
 * Least Valuable: Some of the connect sessions were just about logistics. || * Important: Since many people do not have this background information I think the entire course is important.
 * Do Differently: IP addressing can be very confusing so I would provide more information on that topic. Also more information from the instructor. The book was a great resource but sometimes confusing.
 * Least Valuable: This is an important class but there wasn't a lot of feedback. ||
 * Amy Lamberti || * The most important thing was looking at what a needs analysis was.
 * Nothing differently needed to be done.
 * Having the handouts to provide for each group wasn't needed considering that we shared as groups. || * The most important thing I learned was all the capabilities of tools I had not used. I also learned you can teach yourself.
 * Having feedback on the projects would have been beneficial.
 * Advanced and core projects wasn't needed. Pick just one project to complete. || * The most important thing learned was reflecting on the professional groups.
 * Beefed up the content. Much was a repeat of what we'd learned in undergrad.
 * All the paper writing- UGH || * The most important thing learned how to correctly design a project. Key points I already knew were highlighted again for me.
 * What I would have done differently was had meaningful projects vs. just one.
 * The least valuable thing in the course it was a repeat week after week. || * The most important thing learned was everything - Great class.
 * What I would have done differently was nothing - really liked everything.
 * The least valuable thing in the course was nothing. I really liked everything. || * The most important thing learned was creating the AUP and budget.
 * What I would have done differently was nothing. I learned a lot and enjoyed myself.
 * The least valuable thing in the course was a few glitches in the group roles. || * The most important thing learned
 * What I would have done differently
 * The least valuable thing in the course || * The most important thing learned was looking at the ISTE and NET standards. Very informative and beneficial.
 * Nothing
 * I enjoyed this class very much || * The most important thing learned was the mini lessons each week. I thought they helped to look at the content clearly.
 * Changing assignment dates was hard to get straight.
 * The least valuable thing in the course nothing. || * The class was one of my favorites. I liked looking at FLIPPING the classroom with design.
 * I can't think of anything to change.
 * The only invaluable thing I thought was the confusion with the groups presenting the topics. That was just a "glitch". ||
 * Matt Sutton || * Instructional design and all the components that go with it.
 * Nothing, taught very well.
 * Printing multiple copies if we're just going to present to the whole class. || * Massive amounts of work are possible to get finished with this class.
 * timely feedback, less projects for more time on other ones.
 * write-ups || * History of instructional technology
 * Nothing, really overwhelmed at the beginning, but really enjoyed it
 * Matrix with some really awful websites. || * looking at my design techniques and critiquing my own work.
 * possibly try a group design project.
 * powerpoint for our class that went with it. || * How to use evaluation...correctly
 * Nothing
 * nothing. I really liked this class. Taught exceptionally well. Wei realizes that this can be tough, but he made it very enjoyable the whole way through. || * Technology Plan
 * Nothing, this class went very well.
 * Group rules (time/kepper). By that time all groups already had established a rythm. || * The varying views and opinions of group members for the discussions.
 * Updating the books with the case studies. At lot has happened since 2003 that I'd like to know about.
 * None || * The use if ISTE and NETS. The creation of PD for school.
 * Nothing
 * I enjoyed the class. || * All the mini-lessons for each week.
 * More explanation for the design document. Make sure assignments don't change dates from the rest of the cohort.
 * Jigsaw...I just felt completely overwhelmed. || * The book and final project once it was all done.
 * Confusion because we had to basically create everything on blind faith.
 * Printing out ten copies. One or two would be fine. ||
 * Darcy Newell || * Defining the need for instruction and designing with a purpose
 * Showing a range of design finished design plans and possible evaluating their strengths and weanesses
 * Printing copies || * ALL the tools were terrific practice. The assignments were challenging!
 * provided timely feedback
 * e-books research paper || * Web 2.0 Tools research!
 * Adjust the rubric for assignment #1 (history of the field)to make it clear that it was NOT to be exhaustive!
 * Associations Matrix || * Evaluating my existing resources in terms of design
 * Perhaps have participants evaluate design elements in each other's work as well!
 * synchronous time || * Learning to be relentless in making evaluation tools truly measure specifically defined criteria
 * Can't think of anything!
 * None || * Researching and compiling the hardware/software plan...especially finding all the software for FREE!
 * Nothing (Very helpful and valuable feedback)
 * AUP (though I understand its importance) || * Sharing ethical discussions with classmates
 * Require discussion postings to cite some references, and provide instructor "expert" input, too
 * None || * Staff Development Assignment
 * Made sure every group got a chance to go on sychronous session ;-)
 * Theory presentations || * Design Document
 * Less other topics for discussion, and introduce Design Doc element examples from the start (focus on writing objectives). Also, make sure deadlines and assignments align wtih syllabus
 * None || * Great book! Network plan was a great assignment!
 * Work more on network plan from the start...maybe break down/assign partial elements of the plan to assess textual understanding.
 * Printing copies ||
 * Ben Palmberg || * Learning the correct PD format and thought process will serve me well in the future
 * I would be more clear with what the PD should cover and to what depth it should go. We felt like we scrounged around for the right answer for a long time.
 * Group presentations didn't help much. || * Learning how to us Photoshop and podcasting helped a lot.
 * Provide timely feedback throughout class.
 * The battle of New Orleans was tough if you didn't have a Mac.As were some of the other projects. This project wasn't at all helpful for me. || * The professional association matrix was a great eye-opener and it has changed my thoughts on those type of groups.
 * More student contact.
 * Too much of the class was a repeat of undergrad learning theory || * I have been messing up the visual aspect of communication for a long time. This class helped out A TON!
 * The instructions where sometimes unclear
 * The synchronous sessions where not all that helpful || * WOW! This class was very educational. the process of evaluating the validity of a program will be something that I'm going to be doing in the future (hopefully) and I know enough to do it well now.
 * Some more clarity throughout would be nice.
 * The resume work didn't help much. || * The work with policy stuff (i.e. AUP) was awesome and useful in reality already.
 * I'd change use of synchronous times.
 * The group work and presentation didn't help much || * All of the reflections help give perspective to the program.
 * I would have had synchronous time and interacted more with the students
 * Nothing was useless || * The ideal tech scenario was great.
 * I'd change the use of synchronous time.
 * The social development work didn't help me much || * I loved the final project. Discussing professional development online is a great idea
 * The syllabus, schedule, Moodle page and instruction where very unclear and not consistent..
 * The synchronous sessions didn't add much. || * I loved the work with networks. I learned a great deal about them. The IP addressing and layer work was the most rewarding.
 * More professor input along the way with experience given or speaker
 * The class-interaction activities didn't add much. ||
 * Kai Rush || * How to plan out a technology design plan.
 * Nothing, it was planned and executed perfectly.
 * Honestly, I felt pressured to be in a group with people I am unfamiliar with. I felt we (everyone) in the class should have been slowly merged into groups instead of thrown into groups with people who your grades depend on. || * There were many new tools I learned to play with and now can teach others about.
 * I would have given everyone a chance to create with new tools instead of requiring them to be experts.
 * Honestly, this was one of the most valuable courses, because I was given time to learn new technology tools, so nothing was least valuable, just the expectation to be an expert. This was the only time I thought about dropping the program. || * I learned about technology organizations like ISTE and ICE, which I am now a member of. Also, the jigsaw paper was awesome. It allowed me to be an individual and part of a group at the same time.
 * I would not change a thing. I LOVED THIS COURSE!!!
 * Nothing, but I felt the assignment we did on Saturday could have been done at home. || * This was my favorite and most valuable class. Dr. Hsu taught me the elements needed to design instructional technology documents. After having ETT 530 and thinking about dropping, this class sold me on the program.
 * Only one of the books was useful. The other book was useless.
 * I liked this course so much that I go around quoting graphic design techniques to people, so nothing! || * My group created an iPad evaluation tool I am currently using for an elementary school to help them decide on apps.
 * Nothing, it was a VERY hard course, but I loved it.
 * I was lost at times in what to do and I hate writing educational jargon, but that is my fault, not the professors. || * I just taught a course to new teachers where I handed out the software research sheet and they went crazy over it, so it was very useful.
 * When Dr. Cowan is in control, everything runs smooth.
 * Sometimes, working in the same groups gets old. I would have liked to have been forced to switch up groups for this class. || * I loved being able to read and reply to the whole class. I loved being able to work with other people in the class. Also, I was able to work as an individual and not in a group.
 * Nothing, I feel this class was perfect. Other classmates would like to change it, but I need the break to be able not to collaborate.
 * None. || * ISTE Goals and standards and the theory presentations. I hated them when we did them, but found that most of the stuff in this class was on my technology test.
 * Nothing
 * Nothing || * The document we designed in this course, I am going to use as a moddle Professional Development for teachers in my district.
 * At first, I hated this course, but I found out that this course gave me the perfect finishing information I needed for my degree. Dr. Draper is the bomb!
 * I would have liked an Adobe Connect session on building a Moodle or maybe even getting started on a Moodle. || * I am not selling this book. It will stay on my shelf at work. I know understand LAN/WAN a little more after taking this class.
 * I would have made this a smaller project and for individuals. the reason being, if you break parts up as a group, other people do not learn the part you did. For example, I learned how to assign IP numbers, but my teammates did not.
 * Nothing, but I think others learned less because we broke up the assignments. ||
 * Karen Harkin || +How to build each analysis piece of an instructional design
 * Amy Beetstra || * The entire process of designing instruction based on identified needs of the learner, was a very valuable project.
 * Being a person who likes a clear vision of the end results, it was challenging to piece this project together so blindly. However, I can see the value in only revealing sections piece by piece.
 * The ideal technology scenario project. While it was fun to dream big, looking back, I'm don't remember how it tied in with the course. || * Struggling to learn new/unfamiliar programs was a valid experience. During my internship, I've often been asked to use Mac based program, which I have no prior experience, but I feel more equipped to figure them out. Also, I was able to prepare a Photoshop lesson because of having to learn it for this course.
 * Timely feedback, or lack there of, was the main setback in this course.
 * I don't feel I could classify anything as invaluable from this course. At times it was hard to see the relevance, especially in relation to the quantity. Overall, though, aside from the topic of the projects, the behind the scene skills gained were what added value. || * How people learn matrix---valuable exercise in synthesizing the three major learning styles and making connections with content I teach.
 * I would've enjoyed more group interaction/projects. I found the assignments to be valuable to the program goals...use at least 2 if not 3 for my portfolio.
 * I found it all valuable. || * Using our own work to evaluate design was beneficial. I love this topic, and studied it while completing my undergrad, so having the "refresher" course definitely enhanced that prior knowledge.
 * I think adding more variety, rather than focusing on PowerPoint's, would have made the course even more beneficial.
 * As a result of the heavy focus on PowerPoint's, It felt very repetitive, especially since the courses I was teaching were more project based than lecture based. Because the classes I was teaching at the time were more project based than lecture based, I didn't really have content intensive PowerPoint's, making the assignments feel very repetitive. || * Creating effective evaluation tools was the most important thing I learned in this course.
 * Nothing
 * Looking back, I feel that all of our assignments were valuable and pertinent to the understanding of the course content. || * Personnel planning, AUP, and hardware/software were beneficial in gaining a deeper understanding of that type of administrative role.
 * I feel like the content was relevant and the delivery effective, so I'd change nothing.
 * Technical glitches, beyond professors control, hindered the effectiveness of the online synchronous sessions. || * Interacting through group discussion, and sharing of opinions.
 * Updated course texts would've. The format wasn't my favorite, but I did enjoy the change of pace.
 * Despite the older case studies, I feel there was still a lot of value in discussing the significance of each case. || * The hands on technology integration application was the most beneficial aspect of this course.
 * I wish it was a larger component of the course.
 * I found all activities valuable. || * Designing effective distance learning course.
 * The curve ball due dates were difficult to get on board with; amount and selection of required readings; confusing instruction/Moodle/syllabus
 * The lengthy reflection paper. While I'm a fan of and value reflecting on ones learning and work, I felt the requirements of this assignment to be over the top, especially so close to the time we'd be starting our Portfolios....I was and still am burnt out on reflection after that paper, along with others throughout the cohort and education based degrees! || * I thought the book was a great resource and breaking down the required hardware for a LAN network was a great tool to really understand each element.
 * The Network plan is such a valuable tool for everyone, but was difficult to collaborate on effectively with each member gaining that "expert" knowledge of each part. I think either piecing it together like in previous courses, or a smaller individual activity would've facilitated that knowledge.
 * All information was very relevant to our careers. ||
 * Gay Johnson || -The most valuable part of this class was getting to know the people in our group, our expectations. The work in this class set the bar for the rest of our projects together.
 * Lisa Hatfield || * The organizational steps in successfully completing an instructional design.
 * Provided a finished product at the beginning of class for reference.
 * Presented in printed form discussed with groups (would have rather just presented to entire class) || * How to create and edit the Moodle online portfolio.
 * Provide feedback and grade assignments in a timely manner.
 * Spending so much time and energy on each ungraded assignment. || * Defined the role(s) of an instructional designer/educational technologist.
 * Assigned fewer readings, and added more collaborative activities (but I did appreciate the built-in holiday breaks)
 * Matrix activities. || * How to effectively evaluate and edit my own and others’ presentations.
 * Give more critical feedback.
 * Information was valuable, but only focused on PowerPoint. || * How to effectively evaluate my own or others’ programs.
 * Assigned fewer readings, and added more of a technology component to the course.
 * None – very good class. || * What and how to present technology information/requests to administrators.
 * Altered the synchronous online group activities.
 * “Presenter/Timekeeper” synchronous online group activities. || * Became aware of all the potential ethical issues within the Instructional Technology field.
 * Added online synchronous and group activities.
 * The reflections – most of my content was already used in my forum discussion posts. || * Became more familiar with the NETS and ISTE standards/goals.
 * Stricter guidelines/expectations for the technology-integrated lessons.
 * Technology management portfolio. || * How to effectively and efficiently create an online/distance learning course.
 * Assigned fewer readings and continued with the homework/due date structure of all previous ETT courses.
 * The Jigsaw activity. || * Definition and explanation of various technological and networking terms.
 * FAQs due for every assignment, and combined in an accessible resource document.
 * None – very good class. ||
 * Deanna Herman || * Lesson Plan Creation
 * Defined the overall project clearer initially
 * All activities had value for me || * Creating quality media takes time
 * Less assignments and more software instruction
 * Concept mapping || * Use a Learning Matrix
 * Nothing
 * Concept mapping || * How to create effective presentations for Learning
 * Learning how to contrast type more
 * Apply to other media || * How to design a learning Matrix
 * None
 * I learned a lot in this course || * Building the free software resource
 * None
 * “Presenter/Timekeeper” synchronous online group activities || * Even though I took this class a few semesters ago, it is one of the most valuable in the program. Ethics cannot be stressed enough in the technology field.
 * None
 * None || * Applying the ISTE Goals and staff development
 * Clearer guidelines on the portfolio
 * All of the activities were useful || * Identify and articulate Learning goals and objectives
 * A few less lessons so we can concentrate on the course development
 * Jigsaw activity || * Network plan
 * Clarify logical and physical plan
 * None-I learned a lot ||
 * Julie Linden || * Lesson planning and steps in creating a design
 * show examples of what final project should be
 * would like to have copies of others in class || * Loved learning about all of the tools
 * Would have liked more time on each assignment
 * Would have like feedback and grades on all the assignments || * Learning matrix
 * Readings were long may need less
 * Concept mapping || * Able to use own resources for design.
 * more feedback
 * Would like to see more than Powerpoint used.
 * || * How to evaluate your design with the steakholders
 * None
 * Very good class--enjoyed it! || * Loved the spreadsheet of free sights for software.
 * nothing.great class.
 * The timekeeper/presenter group activities. || * The ideas on ethics, values and morals and how we think about them.
 * more feedback or contact with instructor
 * final reflection was what we had done in the other reflections. || * Staff development was informative. Integrated lesson.
 * Fewer readings.
 * Theory presentations
 * || * How to creat an effective online course from the start.
 * Less readings to do each session.
 * none || * Learning how to design a network plan layout.
 * Met more often to get feedback on the project.
 * none-love the class. ||
 * Luciana Goldstein || * Understanding the Instructional Design Plan Process and the critical 7 steps needed.
 * Perhaps providing samples of a finished product and providing topics.
 * All information for the course was valuable || * Learning about the various media tools.
 * There was so much to cover in a short period of time, perhaps more time focused on understanding the tools and focusing on a few.
 * The final paper. || * Learning about the historical aspects of the profession and the concept map for myself.
 * More application of the theory. Possibly add some discussion questions for the course.
 * All very valuable, but I didn't see the benefit of the group concept mapping. || * Learning to create effective presentations. The book is a great resource.
 * More feedback, provided a listing of assigned topics and provided addtional exercises to go along with the project.
 * Applying the lessons learned to other forms of media. || * Understanding how to develop and effective evaluation a program.
 * Provided more an additional assignment, increased the pace of the course and provided a list of topics.
 * Nothing, all information was a true benefit. || * All the projects in this course were important. The Technology Plan which included the AUP, hardware/software and personnel plan.
 * Nothing
 * Presenter/Timekeeper” synchronous online group activities || * Thinking for various perspectives before be judgemental.
 * Perhaps more activites beyond the case studies.
 * None || * Creating a staff development program, state standards.
 * More technology intergration lessons.
 * Nothing || * I love this class. The document provided provides step by step explaination to creating an online course.
 * More lessons on various aspects of the development process. Also, using various Learning Managemet Systems and eLearning tools.
 * None. || * I learned to understand various aspects of Networking which can come in handy in any job sitcuation.
 * Provide more explaination of for the chapter assignment.
 * All the information was valuable. ||
 * Patti Furlano || * Learned- a new way to conceptualize the Instructional design for educational purposes
 * Change nothing-it was an excellent class
 * Least valuable- some of the the readings were a little basic || * Took 3 590s to replace missing this class.
 * Learned-visual design principles
 * Change- offer them at other locations than just on ampus
 * Least valuable- somebasic information about visual design I already knew || * Learned- the variety of career options for TS students
 * Change- less reading of the theories and more practical application
 * least Valuable- the history of the field || * Learned-powerful ways to increase learning transfer with visual and linguistic connections
 * Change-more the pacing a little faster
 * Least valuable-some of the theory behind the concepts || * Learned-a depper understanding of how evlauation and assessment are an integral part of instructional design
 * Change-A little faster pacing
 * Least Valuable-hard to say-excellent class-perhaps less lecture and a little more application, but really I got a lot out of the class. || * *Learned- some great new free software to share with teachers
 * Change= less technical glitches during adobe sessions
 * Least Valuable- some of the group activities || * Learned-How ethics can be such a grey area
 * Change-A little more contact with the instructor- however the format worked great for me and I am still thinking about the case studies
 * Least valuable-final assignment seemed a little redundent. Perhaps something more job embedded || * Learned-how important it was to make sure all stakeholders are on the same page with pd
 * Change-more individual work
 * Least valuable-some of the readings || * Learned-some of the gurus in the field and thier models for ID
 * Change- way too much on theory, needed more practical application readings.
 * Least valuable- Too many assigments that did not always seem to connect or were very practical || * Learned-Updates on networking
 * Change-very little- good pace and practical applications
 * Least Valuable-really nothing- very job embedded, practical class ||
 * Ryan Read || * Learning the steps in creating and completing an instructional design.
 * Would have provided a finished product for reference at the beginning of the class.
 * All activities were valuable. || * All activities allowed me to increase my knowledge of tech tools.
 * Would have allowed faster feedback and grades.
 * Concept Mapping. || * Great use of Learning Matrix.
 * Assigned fewer reading and added more group activities.
 * Concept Mapping. || * Evaluating established forms and editing presentations.
 * Given more critical feedback.
 * Needed more focuses besides PowerPoint. || * Effectively taught me to evaluate my own and others programs and designs.
 * None.
 * None, very informative class. || * Why and How AUPs work inside instructional technology.
 * Nothing, feedback was constantly helpful.
 * Less technical problems during synchronous online group activities. || * Discussing and sharing of ethical issues within Instructional Technology.
 * Added more synchronous activities.
 * None. || * Staff Development. Very informative.
 * More guidelines for technology integration.
 * Technology portfolio management. || * How to create online/distance learning and practices.
 * Assigned fewer readings.
 * None. || * Loved Networking in 24 hours and how to create a physical network layout.
 * Would have worked on network plans set ups more and criteria for each assignment.
 * None, great class. ||
 * Kate Richards || * Practicing various software
 * Allowing students to use what they have used or able to apply in their own classrooms
 * Feedback given in a timely manner || * Allowing time to explore various technology tools
 * More prompt feedback for assessment
 * Apply products on a windows pc || * Given the opportunity to explore professional development opportunities
 * more sectioned readings within groups
 * researching the history of the field || * Pointing out various displays in PowerPoint
 * Give opportunity for tasks in various presentation softwares
 * Weekly PowerPoint presentations || * Looking at the big picture in instructional design
 * Nothing-enjoyed the class
 * Nothing-enjoyed the class || * Looking at the viewpoint from an adminstrator stand point
 * allowing strong collaboration between groups
 * Giving feedback in a timely manner || * Forum posts in instructional design and values
 * More connection with classmates
 * More discussion with peers online || * Creating effective PD for staff
 * More models for us to learn from
 * Possible questions to ask staff how PD went || * Creating our own class that is distance learning
 * Allowing students to create a class in what they are invested in
 * Giving more clear timeline of when projects/assignments are due || * Learned alot of troubleshooting activities
 * Allowing groups to work together
 * More clear book that is up to date about networking ||